Abstract
To assess the local diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance perfusion (DSC MRP) reporting in differentiating between disease progression and pseudoprogression (PP) at a tertiary UK centre. This retrospective study included adults with histology-proven glioblastoma who underwent an index DSC MRP examination following treatment. Each index examination was evaluated by three reporters independently, including qualitative assessment and measurement of mean regional cerebral blood volume (rCBVmean) ratios. Consensus opinion was used as the reference standard and considered clinical, radiological and histological follow-up information. Examination reports were compared to each other and to the consensus opinion. Thirty-two cases were included (19 progression, 13 pseudoprogression). Interobserver agreement was fair for qualitative opinion (κ=0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.76) and good for rCBVmean ratio measurement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC, two-way random effects model] 0.63, 95% CI=0.43-0.78). Qualitative opinion showed diagnostic accuracies of 77.1% (95% CI=67.4-85.1) for progression and 75% (95% CI=65.1-83.3) for pseudoprogression. rCBVmean ratios were higher for progression (6.85±3.98) than pseudoprogression (3.71±3.40); a 3.0 threshold value maximised the sum of sensitivity (91.1%) and specificity (69.7%) on receiver operating characteristic analysis. DSC MRP and rCBVmean ratio measurement aid differentiation between progression and pseudoprogression following treatment for glioblastoma. Measurement of the rCBVmean ratio shows good interobserver agreement and can change opinion and improve confidence in DSC MRP reporting. Individual centres should validate their own threshold rCBVmean ratio values to optimise diagnostic accuracy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
