Assessing the Costs Associated with Volume-Based Referral for Hepatic Surgery

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough proposed as a means for quality improvement, little is known regarding the economic consequences of volume-based referral. The objective of the current study was to investigate the relationship between inpatient costs and hospital volume. MethodsPatients undergoing elective liver surgery were identified using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2001 to 2012. Multivariable hierarchical regression analyses were performed to calculate and compare risk-adjusted costs and postoperative outcomes across hospital volume terciles. ResultsA total of 27,813 patients underwent surgery at 2207 hospitals. Although costs were comparable across the three volume groups (all p > 0.05), patients who developed a postoperative complication incurred a higher overall cost (complication vs. no complication; median costs $17,974 [IQR 13,865–25,623] vs. $41,731 [IQR 27,008–64,266], p < 0.001). In contrast, while the incidence of postoperative complications (low vs. intermediate vs. high; 22.0 vs. 19.2 vs. 13.0 %, p < 0.001) and subsequent failure-to-rescue (low vs. intermediate vs. high; 16.6 vs. 24.7 vs. 15.1 %, p < 0.001) was lower at high-volume hospitals, costs associated with “rescue” were substantially higher at high-volume hospitals (low vs. intermediate vs. high; $39,289 vs. $36,157 vs. $48,559, both p < 0.001). ConclusionsCompared with lower volume hospitals, improved outcomes among patients who developed a complication at high-volume hospitals were associated with an increased cost.