Abstract
The current study addressed the consistency of eddy covariance (EC) measurements collected in sloping conditions within a hilly agricultural catchment. In the context of operational monitoring and modelling devoted to decision support, it is important to increase the knowledge of surface fluxes under conditions of hilly topography. The two-metre-high EC measurements were collected at the field scale within the two opposite rims of a V-shaped catchment located in northeastern Tunisia on the southern shore of the Mediterranean Basin. Measurements were collected under bare soil conditions to enhance the effects of the slopes. The data pre-processing and quality control measures were conducted using standard procedures. In assessing the consistency of the EC measurements we first compared the airflow inclinations captured by the EC measurements against the topographical slopes captured by a Digital Elevation Model; we then assessed the energy balance closure. The analysis of the micrometeorological data indicated specific regimes: externally driven winds; forced convection; and stability conditions close to neutrality or low instability. The two dominant wind directions induced upward and downward flows on the two opposite rims. For the upward flows, the airflow inclinations followed the topographical slopes on both fields. For the downward flows, the flows followed the topographical slopes on the southern rim and were almost horizontal on the other rim. In all cases, and especially for the upward flows, the energy balance closure was similar to that reported in the literature. Overall, the behaviour observed for upward flows was close to that reported in the literature for flat conditions, whereas the downward flows exhibited different trends. The different trends we observed for the downward flows were ascribed to the bubble separation zone that implies streamline dilatation, turbulence and reverse flows. Future investigations should address the vegetation conditions. The expected outcomes are of importance for revisiting the operational methods devoted to the estimation of evapotranspiration.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.