Abstract

The techno-economic analysis of an IGCC power plant coupled with integrated intermittent chemical looping air separation (IICLAS) as Design 1 and an IGCC polygeneration plant integrated with chemical looping hydrogen generation (CLHG) as Design 2 are addressed. The economic evaluations show that (i) the total overnight cost of capital (TOCC) of Design 1 is higher than it of Design 2 by 3.6% and (ii) the total fixed and variable operation and maintenance cost (TOMC) of Design 1 is higher than it of Design 2 by 17.8%. These comparisons imply that the potential investment opportunities in Design 2 are more than Design 1. According to recent reports of the internal rate of return (IRR) for the coal-fired power plant investment around 8%∼12%, Design 2 guarantees the minimum acceptable IRR with 14.1% even though its revenue is reduced by 30%. For assessing the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) with 0.058USD/kWh and the dynamic payback period (DPP) with 6.6 years, these beneficial results raise the commercial potential of Design 2.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call