Abstract

BackgroundThe capacity to demand and use research is critical for governments if they are to develop policies that are informed by evidence. Existing tools designed to assess how government officials use evidence in decision-making have significant limitations for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs); they are rarely tested in LMICs and focus only on individual capacity. This paper introduces an instrument that was developed to assess Ministry of Health (MoH) capacity to demand and use research evidence for decision-making, which was tested for reliability and validity in eight LMICs (Bangladesh, Fiji, India, Lebanon, Moldova, Pakistan, South Africa, Zambia).MethodsInstrument development was based on a new conceptual framework that addresses individual, organisational and systems capacities, and items were drawn from existing instruments and a literature review. After initial item development and pre-testing to address face validity and item phrasing, the instrument was reduced to 54 items for further validation and item reduction. In-country study teams interviewed a systematic sample of 203 MoH officials. Exploratory factor analysis was used in addition to standard reliability and validity measures to further assess the items.ResultsThirty items divided between two factors representing organisational and individual capacity constructs were identified. South Africa and Zambia demonstrated the highest level of organisational capacity to use research, whereas Pakistan and Bangladesh were the lowest two. In contrast, individual capacity was highest in Pakistan, followed by South Africa, whereas Bangladesh and Lebanon were the lowest.ConclusionThe framework and related instrument represent a new opportunity for MoHs to identify ways to understand and improve capacities to incorporate research evidence in decision-making, as well as to provide a basis for tracking change.

Highlights

  • The capacity to demand and use research is critical for governments if they are to develop policies that are informed by evidence

  • This paper describes the development of the conceptual framework that focuses on the internal processes at Ministry of Health (MoH) and the interactions across the three levels of capacity, and we present an instrument designed to assess MoH capacity to demand and use research evidence for decision-making, including the results from testing in multiple low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)

  • Instrument development In order to capture the constructs of the conceptual framework completely, items were developed by (1) adapting items from existing instruments found in the literature review, (2) adapting items from earlier work by Instrument components The draft instrument was divided into three sections that correspond to the three levels of capacity included in the conceptual framework, namely individual, organisational and systems levels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The capacity to demand and use research is critical for governments if they are to develop policies that are informed by evidence. In order for decisions to be upheld, officials must balance the application of evidence with the larger systemic pressures they face to reach a resolution that “maintains the stability of the system” [4]. Recognising these forces and their role in supporting evidence use is critical because they require specific capacities to successfully support the incorporation of research evidence in regular decision-making

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.