Assessing Student Performance Using a Novel Rubric Based on the Dreyfus Model of Skill Acquisition

Abstract

ObjectivePharmacy student performance on practicum was previously assessed using a Likert scale from 0 to 9, resulting in challenges with clarity and assessor subjectivity. To address these issues, an assessment rubric based on the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition was developed and implemented. This study sought to evaluate student, practice educator (PE), and faculty perceptions related to the rubric’s effectiveness in assessing student performance within the direct patient care practicum setting. MethodsAn exploratory sequential mixed methods approach was used. A qualitative component using focus groups and semistructured interviews was followed by a quantitative component using a survey questionnaire. Data gathered from the qualitative component were collectively analyzed and used to inform questionnaire development intended to confirm identified themes and collect further data on stakeholder perceptions. ResultsA total of 7 students, 7 PEs, and 4 faculty participated in the focus groups/interviews and 70 of 645 (10.9%) students and 103 of 756 (13.6%) PEs participated in the survey questionnaire. The majority of the participants felt that the rubric clearly communicated the expectations for student performance, is relevant and consistent with pharmacy practice, and is useful in accurately assessing performance. For PEs with experience, the novel rubric was an improvement over the previous assessment processes and perceived as more thorough and clearer in describing performance expectations. The identified challenges included the rubric’s visual organization, length, and redundancy of some of the assessment elements. ConclusionOur findings suggest that a novel rubric based on the Dreyfus model is effective in assessing student performance on practicum and may address some of the challenges commonly observed with performance assessment.