Abstract

Abstract. Stratospheric transport in global circulation models and chemistry–climate models is an important component in simulating the recovery of the ozone layer as well as changes in the climate system. The Brewer–Dobson circulation is not well constrained by observations and further investigation is required to resolve uncertainties related to the mechanisms driving the circulation. This study has assessed the specified dynamics mode of the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model (CMAM30) by comparing to the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier transform spectrometer (ACE-FTS) profile measurements of CFC-11 (CCl3F), CFC-12 (CCl2F2), and N2O. In the CMAM30 specified dynamics simulation, the meteorological fields are nudged using the ERA-Interim reanalysis and a specified tracer was employed for each species, with hemispherically defined surface measurements used as the boundary condition. A comprehensive sampling technique along the line of sight of the ACE-FTS measurements has been utilized to allow for direct comparisons between the simulated and measured tracer concentrations. The model consistently overpredicts tracer concentrations of CFC-11, CFC-12, and N2O in the lower stratosphere, particularly in the northern hemispheric winter and spring seasons. The three mixing barriers investigated, including the polar vortex, the extratropical tropopause, and the tropical pipe, show that there are significant inconsistencies between the measurements and the simulations. In particular, the CMAM30 simulation underpredicts mixing efficiency in the tropical lower stratosphere during the June–July–August season.

Highlights

  • As highlighted by Butchart (2014), interest in stratospheric transport has increased over the last 20 years as a result of significant developments in stratosphere-resolving general circulation models (GCMs) (e.g. Pawson et al, 2000; Gerber, 2012) and chemistry–climate models (CCMs) (e.g. Eyring et al, 2005; SPARC-Climate Chemistry Model Validation (CCMVal), 2010)

  • Kolonjari et al.: Stratospheric transport in CMAM30 stratosphere is primarily controlled by the Brewer–Dobson circulation (BDC), which is generally characterized by tropospheric air entering the stratosphere in the tropics, poleward transport, and descent in the midlatitude and polar regions of the winter hemisphere (e.g. Plumb, 2002; Butchart, 2014, and references therein)

  • By treating each tracer in the specified dynamics simulation explicitly, the CMAM30HR run allows for the direct comparison of the measurements to model output

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As highlighted by Butchart (2014), interest in stratospheric transport has increased over the last 20 years as a result of significant developments in stratosphere-resolving general circulation models (GCMs) (e.g. Pawson et al, 2000; Gerber, 2012) and chemistry–climate models (CCMs) (e.g. Eyring et al, 2005; SPARC-CCMVal, 2010). As part of the Climate Chemistry Model Validation (CCMVal) project, Lin and Fu (2013) investigated simulated changes in the BDC by considering three branches separately: the transition, shallow, and deep branches They found that changes in the transition and shallow branches of the BDC were consistent with the increase of greenhouse gas concentrations and the trends were associated with changes in subtropical jets and tropical upper tropospheric temperatures, which is consistent with the mechanism described by Shepherd and McLandress (2011). The CMAM specified dynamics simulation has been investigated in a few recent studies: McLandress et al (2014) evaluated the polar cap mesospheric transport and midlatitude mean zonal winds, and long term observational records of water vapour and ozone were used to evaluate the CMAM30 run by Hegglin et al (2014) and Shepherd et al (2014), respectively.

ACE-FTS
The model
The specified dynamics simulation
Influence of the surface boundary conditions
Influence of nudging on the age of stratospheric air
TLP model
Zonal mean comparison technique
Joint probability density functions
The influence of beta angle
Comparison of sampling techniques
15 Equatorward
General features of tracer morphology comparisons
Seasonality of the tracer morphology comparisons
Comparison of mixing barriers
The polar vortex
The extratropical tropopause
The tropical pipe
Using a TLP model to interpret CMAM30HR
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.