Abstract

This paper presents a method and tool to achieve a trade-off between workload on assessors of semester-long team-based design projects in large classes, with the need for fair and comprehensive assessmentsof each student individually. Students “book time” throughout the semester, recording their level of input into each project element. They each provide totals for time spent on each element of their final reports. The instructor assesses each design report as if one person wrote it. These data are combined into a single rubric/ spreadsheet. The rubric scales report assessments to accommodate differences in team size, and generates a unique grade for each student in a team. Examples are given in the paper, as are details from the implementation of the method in a Fall 2015 introductory design course. There is anecdotal evidence that the method works, but there is always room for improvement. Several ideas for future modifications to method are discussed. All spreadsheets, documentation, and examples are freely available via the Web. Links are provided.

Highlights

  • This paper summarizes some 15 years’ effort by the authors to find an “optimal” method and tool for assessing semester-long, team-based undergraduate engineering design projects

  • This paper presents a method and tool to achieve a trade-off between workload on assessors of semester-long team-based design projects in large classes, with the need for fair and comprehensive assessments of each student individually

  • Since we are talking about design projects here, the paper itself is organized along the lines of a design report

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

This paper summarizes some 15 years’ effort by the authors to find an “optimal” method and tool for assessing semester-long, team-based undergraduate engineering design projects. While the historical journey through those years may be quite interesting, this paper will focus mainly on the most current grading approach, and some ideas that will be tried in 2016. The work presented here is all in the context of a 2nd year course in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (MIE) at Ryerson University, MEC325 - Introduction to Engineering Design, which is mandatory for all mechanical and industrial engineering students. Since we are talking about design projects here, the paper itself is organized along the lines of a design report

DESIGN BRIEF
REQUIREMENTS
CONCEPT DESIGN
IMPLEMENTATION IN 2015
FUTURE WORK
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.