Abstract

To assess whether imperiled species are covered by existing protections in the biologically-rich state of Nevada, U.S.A., we compared the distribution of reserves with known imperiled species occurrences. For species poorly represented in reserves, we determined whether they were receiving alternate protection under the U.S. Endangered Species Act or voluntary conservation plans. A majority (212, 55%) of Nevada’s 384 imperiled species had fewer than 25% of occurrences in reserves and most (282, 68%) had fewer than 50% of occurrences in reserves. Of imperiled species with less than 25% or fewer than two occurrences in reserves, only 9% are currently receiving alternate protection from the Endangered Species Act or voluntary plans. These results suggest that providing protection for imperiled species in Nevada will require both an expansion of the existing reserve system, which currently covers 14% of the state, and protection of more species under the Endangered Species Act or other programs. By dividing Nevada into equal-sized hexagons and scoring each of these hexagons based on a rarity-weighted richness index of imperiled species occurrences, we identified 19 imperiled species hot spots in Nevada. No imperiled species occurrences were protected in seven (37%) and less than half were protected in 11 (58%) of these hot spots. Protecting these areas could provide important additional protection for imperiled species in Nevada. Evaluations of protective measures for biological diversity should include the full suite of protections, including both reserves and laws and regulations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.