Assessing Procedural Justice in the Administration of Small-Scale Benthic Fisheries in Chile

Rodrigo A Estévez,Gabriel Jerez,Stefan Gelcich

doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.636120

Abstract

In order to navigate toward ocean sustainability, policies, programs, and scientific research must address issues of justice. In fisheries management, justice has generally been understood in terms of the distribution of social, cultural, and economic benefits. However, there are also important procedural justice challenges in the fisheries system, which are fundamental to the long-term sustainability and equity of the oceans. Procedural justice is related to the conditions under which the negotiation for benefit distribution takes place. That is, the procedures, structures, and processes that lead to the distribution of resources. In this study, we empirically assess fishers’ perceptions of procedural justice components within a small-scale fishery management policy in Chile which has been shifting toward a polycentric type of governance during the past 7 years. We specifically assess perceptions of management committee members. Management committees have been constituted as spaces of collective action for participatory decision-making. We decompose procedural justice in seven subcomponents and assess perceptions associated to achievement in the administration of fisheries. Our results show that management committee members perceive heterogeneity in the achievement of different procedural justice components, which is a central element in achieving equitable development in the oceans. The highest perceptions of achievement were found in the procedures for the selection of participants, the use of various types of technical and local knowledge for decision-making, and the perception by participants of ethical and impartial procedures. We also identified significant challenges related to an inflexible legal structure that hinders adaptive management and learning as a tool for institutional transformation. In addition, mechanisms for communicating decisions to users and clear accountability procedures were perceived as weak. It is critical to address these gaps as they can jeopardize the implementation and legitimacy of fisheries management. Focusing on different components of procedural justice can provide an important lens through which advances and gaps in fisheries policy can be identified and worked upon.

Highlights

The oceans are critical to global human well-being (Costello et al, 2020)
In order to ensure the sustainable management of benthic resources, a Territorial Use Rights for Fisheries (TURFs) was implemented in 1997 (Gelcich et al, 2010)
The focus of policy and research in coastal fisheries has generally been on distributive justice (Österblom et al, 2020)

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The oceans are critical to global human well-being (Costello et al, 2020). as a result of intensive extraction, marine environments are exposed to overexploitation and habitat destruction (Jackson et al, 2001; Halpern et al, 2008). Based on Leventhal’s model (Leventhal, 1980), Tyler (1988) proposed six rules to estimate achievement for the specific procedural justice components These rules include: (1) Control that estimates the influence of stakeholders on decision-making. (5) Correctability that estimates the ability to modify or reverse decisions through the process and (6) Ethicality that estimates whether authorities respect people’s rights in proceedings These rules are subjective evaluations regarding the achievement of procedural justice (Daigle et al, 1996) and provide an understanding of the actors’ concerns with respect to procedural justice (Colquitt, 2001; Blader and Tyler, 2003). We discuss the implications of these findings for informing transitions toward fisheries sustainability more broadly

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RESULTS

DISCUSSION

ETHICS STATEMENT