Abstract

This paper explores pre-service history teachers' ability to recognize and reflect on typical situations occurring in the history classroom and to link these to students' historical learning. Therefore, we draw on the concept of professional vision (Goodwin, 1994), which assumes that teachers need a professional knowledge base to monitor and to reason about teaching and student learning. Based on theoretical notions of teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), we investigated history teachers' professional vision by means of a video survey with integrated video clips, open-ended writing assignments and standardized item ratings. We collected data from 303 and 220 pre-service teachers at the beginning and at the end, respectively, of their subject-specific teacher training. The collected data open up the possibility of 'simultaneous triangulation' (Morse, 1991), which was used for test validation. First, we tested the reliability of the closed-ended test instrument using item response theory, in order to develop a feasible test model. Second, we investigated the validity of the test instrument by comparing test results with the findings of the open-ended writing task. In general, student teachers reached rather low test scores. They experienced difficulties in assessing classroom events in terms of their potential to support historical competencies and to evaluate the consequences for students' learning. Findings from the open writing assignment show that student teachers commented largely on generic teaching strategies while hardly noticing student learning. In sum, the chosen methodological approaches seem to contribute to a more distinct picture of preservice teachers' abilities to reason about history teaching and learning.

Highlights

  • This paper explores pre-service history teachers’ ability to recognize and reflect on typical situations occurring in the history classroom and to link these to students’ historical learning

  • German history educationalists belonging to the FUER group (FUER-Geschichtsbewusstsein project stands for Förderung und Entwicklung eines reflektierten Geschichtsbewusstseins; or Promotion and Development of a Reflected Historical Consciousness; see Körber et al, 2007) defined four historical competencies: (1) being able to ask historical questions; (2) using methodological approaches to analyse and interpret relevant historical sources and accounts; (3) providing orientation – that is, developing the ability to reflect on information and insights about the past and to connect these to one’s own life, orienting students towards their own identities; and (4) developing subject matter competency, which relates to history as a mental construct, including the ability to make use of first- and second-order historical concepts that help to structure the discipline

  • Test scales that required the assessment of the implementation of didactic principles, such as perspective taking/recognition of alterity and asking historical questions, had to be excluded

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper explores pre-service history teachers’ ability to recognize and reflect on typical situations occurring in the history classroom and to link these to students’ historical learning. There seems to be a broad consensus that history teaching should foster students’ ‘historical thinking’ (Seixas, 2017; Wineburg, 2001), ‘historical reasoning’ (Van Drie and Van Boxtel, 2008) or ‘historical learning’ (VanSledright, 2014) These concepts comprise similar aspects of historical thinking, such as asking historical questions, applying heuristics while working with sources (sourcing, contextualization, corroboration) and using second-order concepts or disciplinary ideas that structure the discipline (Lee, 2011: 137). Our video-based research project, VisuHist, investigated pre-service teachers’ ability to recognize key features of history teaching with a potential to foster historical competencies and to evaluate the consequences for students’ learning. The pedagogical ‘knowledge base’, including the cognitive knowledge required to create effective teaching and learning environments, must be taught during teacher training (for example, Blömeke and Delaney, 2012)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call