Abstract
Multi-cohort forest management in northern hardwood stands may well be the best way to successfully regenerate tree species of intermediate shade tolerance, such as yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britt.). The creation of large enough gaps in the canopy favors increased light availability within the opening, while soil scarification provides suitable germination seedbeds. Evidence of these methods’ success nonetheless remains mostly the purview of experimental studies rather than operational tests. In Quebec, Canada, the multi-cohort methods promoted include group selection cutting and patch cutting. The present study tested their implementation at an operational scale and over a large territory in both hardwood-dominated and mixedwood stands. We assessed their efficacy in promoting natural regeneration of commercial hardwood trees, notably yellow birch and sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.). We conducted regeneration surveys at 2, 5, 10, and 15 years after harvest. Overall, group selection and patch cuttings were successful in regenerating the target species. Yellow birch, for instance, showed a mean stocking around 60% and a mean sapling density around 3400 stems ha−1 after 15 years. We compared several variables for measuring regeneration in early years, and found that the relative abundance, the stocking based on one stem per sampling unit, and the mean maximum height were good predictors of the relative presence of yellow birch and sugar maple in 15-year-old canopy openings. Using smaller sampling units (6.25 m2 rather than 25 m2) and waiting until year 5 may be more useful for making such predictions. In addition, there was an important turnover in vertical dominance in these openings. Non-commercial woody competitors were frequently dominant in early years but were often replaced by commercial hardwoods, notably yellow birch. We propose certain thresholds for assessing the success of post-harvest regeneration and for evaluating the need for a cleaning treatment.
Highlights
Different variations of multi-cohort forest management that build on the concept of gap dynamics [1] have been increasingly considered as the most adequate way of naturally regenerating the temperate hardwood forest because they emulate natural disturbances [2], even though these methods have not been universally adopted [3]
Canopy openings created through group selection and patch cutting always succeeded in at least minimally bringing back commercial tree species after 15 years, since there was no cluster with a Stock-1 of zero when looking at all commercial species, both hardwoods and conifers, combined
It was observed that sugar maple (SM) and yellow birch (YB) displayed no cluster with Stock-1 values below 10% and 15%, respectively (Figure 2a,b), whereas paper birch (PB), INTOL, TOL, and coniferous species pool (CONIF) presented no cluster above 70%, 55%, 85%, and 70%, respectively (Figure 2c–f)
Summary
Different variations of multi-cohort forest management that build on the concept of gap dynamics [1] have been increasingly considered as the most adequate way of naturally regenerating the temperate hardwood forest because they emulate natural disturbances [2], even though these methods have not been universally adopted [3]. The main natural disturbances driving the succession dynamics of these forests are windthrows [4,5] and other tree-falls [6], e.g., related to individual tree deaths, which produce gaps in the canopy of small [7,8] to intermediate size and severity [9,10]. These disturbances still remain limited in comparison with the more severe disturbances such as fires. Other partial harvest methods have been developed centered on the creation of gaps of varying sizes in the canopy, including, but not limited to, group selection cutting [22,23], patch cutting [1], and more recently irregular shelterwood [24]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.