Assessing Patients beyond the Simple Optics of BMI: The Concomitant Role of Sarcopenia and BMI in Predicting Kidney Transplant Outcomes.

Abstract

Body composition is associated with prognosis in many clinical settings, and patients undergoing kidney transplantation are often high risk with multiple comorbidities. We aimed to assess the effect of sarcopenia and body composition on transplant outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 274 kidney transplants with CT scans within 3 years of transplantation. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the L3 vertebrae was used to evaluate sarcopenia (SMI < 40.31 cm2/m2 in males, <30.88 cm2/m2 in females). Sarcopenia, body mass index (BMI), and the visceral-to-subcutaneous-fat ratio (VSR) were assessed separately. We also used a composite BMI/sarcopenia measurement in four patient groups: BMI < 25/Non-Sarcopenic, BMI < 25/Sarcopenic, BMI > 25/Non-Sarcopenic, and BMI > 25/Sarcopenic. The outcomes measured were eGFR (1 and 3 months; and 1, 3, and 5 years), delayed graft function (DGF), rejection, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and post-operative complications. Sarcopenia was associated with an increased 1-year risk of MACE (OR 3.41, p = 0.036). BMI alone had no effect on function, DGF, MACE, or on other complications. High VSR was associated with a lower risk of DGF (OR 0.473, p = 0.016). When sarcopenia and BMI were assessed together, the BMI > 25/sarcopenic patients had the poorest outcomes, with increased risk of MACE (OR 26.06, p = 0.001); poorer eGFR at 1, 3, 12, and 36 months; (p < 0.05 at all timepoints), and poorer graft survival (p = 0.002). Sarcopenia alone is associated with an increased risk of MACE. Overweight sarcopenic patients are additionally at increased risk of graft loss and have poorer graft function for up to three years.