Abstract

Background Modification of endosteal implants through surface treatments have been investigated to improve osseointegration. Boronization has demonstrated favorable mechanical properties, but limited studies have assessed translational, in vivo outcomes. This study investigated the effect of implant surface boronization on bone healing. Material and Methods Two implant surface roughness profiles (acid etched, machined) in CP titanium (type II) alloy implants were boronized by solid-state diffusion until 10-15µm boron coating was achieved. The surface-treated implants were placed bilaterally into 5 adult sheep ilia for three and six weeks. Four implant groups were tested: boronized machined (BM), boronized acid-etched (BAA), control machined (CM), and control acid-etched (CAA). Osseointegration was quantified by calculating bone to implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO). Results Both implant types treated with boronization had BIC values not statistically different from machined control implants at t=3 weeks, and significantly less than acid-etched control (p<0.02). BAFO values were not statistically different for all 3-week groups except machined control (significantly less at p<0.02). BAFO had a significant downward trend from 3 to 6 weeks in both boronized implant types (p<0.03) while both control implant types had significant increases in BIC and BAFO from 3 to 6 weeks. Conclusions Non-decalcified histology depicted intramembranous-like healing/remodeling in bone for controls, but an absence of this dynamic process in bone for boronized implants. These findings are inconsistent with in vitro work describing bone regenerative properties of elemental Boron and suggests that effects of boron on in vivo bone healing warrant further investigation. Key words:Boronization, acid-etched, machined, implants, osseointegration, in vivo, solid-state diffusion.

Highlights

  • Successful endosteal implant placement is measured by a desired bone healing response that results in predictable long-term implant stability and function

  • The histomorphometric results demonstrated no significant differences for bone to implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) values for boronized implant groups as a function of surface texture (as machined (M) vs acid etched (AA)) at the individual time points, 3- and 6-weeks (p>0.05) (Fig. 2)

  • On the other hand, when evaluating as a function of time (3- vs 6-weeks) significantly (p

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Successful endosteal implant placement is measured by a desired bone healing response that results in predictable long-term implant stability and function. This necessary response, termed osseointegration, is governed by the tissue-implant surface interface, implant geometry, surgical procedure/placement and the bone remodeling processes over time [1]. Material and Methods: Two implant surface roughness profiles (acid etched, machined) in CP titanium (type II) alloy implants were boronized by solid-state diffusion until 10-15μm boron coating was achieved. Results: Both implant types treated with boronization had BIC values not statistically different from machined control implants at t=3 weeks, and significantly less than acid-etched control (p

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call