ASSESSING NITROGEN NUTRITIONAL STATUS, BIOMASS AND YIELD OF COTTON WITH NDVI, SPAD AND PETIOLE SAP NITRATE CONCENTRATION

Abstract

SUMMARYCanopy normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), soil plant analysis development (SPAD) reading and petiole sap NO3−‒N concentration are increasingly used as quick and non-destructive methods to monitor plant N nutrition and growth status and predict yield of crops. However, little information is available on the comparisons of these three methods in assessing N nutrition, growth and yield for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Four N rates (0, 34, 67 and 101 kg N ha−1) under two cover conditions [no cover crop and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) crop] in a 33-year long-term field trial were used to evaluate how canopy NDVI, SPAD reading (related to chlorophyll content) and petiole sap NO3−‒N concentration (conventional method) are able to assess N nutrition and plant biomass and predict yield for cotton. Canopy NDVI and SPAD readings responded less sensitively to N rates than petiole sap NO3−‒N. The responses of NDVI and SPAD reading to N rates were generally reduced due to the winter cover crop with hairy vetch. Significant and positive correlations existed mostly among NDVI, SPAD reading, and petiole sap NO3−‒N concentration. Canopy NDVI during mid-bloom to late bloom and SPAD reading during early bloom to late bloom were effective alternative methods for assessing cotton N nutrition status. The SPAD reading at late bloom was an effective parameter to estimate cotton biomass. The NDVI at early square and SPAD reading during early square to mid-bloom were effective for cotton yield prediction.