Abstract

Biodiversity plays an integral role in the livelihoods of subsistence-based forest-dwelling communities and as a consequence it is increasingly important to develop quantitative approaches that capture not only changes in taxonomic diversity, but also variation in natural resources and provisioning services. We apply a functional diversity metric originally developed for addressing questions in community ecology to assess utilitarian diversity of 56 forest plots in Madagascar. The use categories for utilitarian plants were determined using expert knowledge and household questionnaires. We used a null model approach to examine the utilitarian (functional) diversity and utilitarian redundancy present within ecological communities. Additionally, variables that might influence fluctuations in utilitarian diversity and redundancy—specifically number of felled trees, number of trails, basal area, canopy height, elevation, distance from village—were analyzed using Generalized Linear Models (GLMs). Eighteen of the 56 plots showed utilitarian diversity values significantly higher than expected. This result indicates that these habitats exhibited a low degree of utilitarian redundancy and were therefore comprised of plants with relatively distinct utilitarian properties. One implication of this finding is that minor losses in species richness may result in reductions in utilitarian diversity and redundancy, which may limit local residents' ability to switch between alternative choices. The GLM analysis showed that the most predictive model included basal area, canopy height and distance from village, which suggests that variation in utilitarian redundancy may be a result of local residents harvesting resources from the protected area. Our approach permits an assessment of the diversity of provisioning services available to local communities, offering unique insights that would not be possible using traditional taxonomic diversity measures. These analyses introduce another tool available to conservation biologists for assessing how future losses in biodiversity will lead to a reduction in natural resources and provisioning services from forests.

Highlights

  • The livelihoods of rural, subsistence societies living in and around forests are intimately connected to the natural resources that can be procured from these ecosystems [1,2]

  • We focused on three questions regarding availability of important service provider groups: 1. What is the utilitarian diversity and utilitarian redundancy within plant assemblages in Ranomafana National Park (RNP)?

  • The null model simulations assessed whether observed utilitarian diversity deviated significantly from that of the randomly assembled utilitarian species pools in RNP

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The livelihoods of rural, subsistence societies living in and around forests are intimately connected to the natural resources that can be procured from these ecosystems [1,2]. The diversity of wild plants within forests supply people with a range of services, such as wood for fuel, timber for construction, as well as numerous non-timber forest products (NTFPs) for food, weaving and medicines [3] Access to these resources is necessary for sustaining livelihood practices and preserving important cultural, commercial, and spiritual activities [4,5,6]. Over time, these natural resources may become depleted through a complex set of external and internal factors. It is important to assess variation in natural resource use and its concomitant effect on biodiversity using metrics that accurately reflect the utilitarian demands of rural forest-dwelling communities

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.