Abstract
Although various upper digestive endoscopy visibility scores are available, no comparative studies have directly evaluated them to determine the most effective tool. A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the inter- and intra-rater agreement of four upper digestive endoscopy visibility scores. A dataset of 32 videos was randomly selected from a collection of complete endoscopy procedures. Eight videos were assessed twice to estimate the intra-rater reliability. Eleven evaluators, four of whom had over five years of experience, independently rated the videos using four different scoring systems: Elvas, Kuo, Bhandari, and Chen.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.