Abstract

Deceit often occurs in questionnaire surveys, which leads to the misreporting of data and poor reliability. The purpose of this study is to explore whether eye-tracking could contribute to the detection of deception in questionnaire surveys, and whether the eye behaviors that appeared in instructed lying still exist in spontaneous lying. Two studies were conducted to explore eye movement behaviors in instructed and spontaneous lying conditions. The results showed that pupil size and fixation behaviors are both reliable indicators to detect lies in questionnaire surveys. Blink and saccade behaviors do not seem to predict deception. Deception resulted in increased pupil size, fixation count and duration. Meanwhile, respondents focused on different areas of the questionnaire when lying versus telling the truth. Furthermore, in the actual deception situation, the linear support vector machine (SVM) deception classifier achieved an accuracy of 74.09%. In sum, this study indicates the eye-tracking signatures of lying are not restricted to instructed deception, demonstrates the potential of using eye-tracking to detect deception in questionnaire surveys, and contributes to the questionnaire surveys of sensitive issues.

Highlights

  • Questionnaire is one of the most widely used tools for data collection due to its wide range of applications, flexibility, speed, and convenience (Taherdoost, 2016)

  • Delgado-Herrera et al (2021) performed a meta-analysis of fMRI deception tasks through a review from 2001 to 2019, and the results showed that the tasks with low ecological validity and high ecological validity lead to different areas of brain activation, perhaps because the tasks with high ecological validity are more realistic, and engage a broader network of brain mechanisms

  • This study explored the feasibility of eye-tracking for lie detection in questionnaire surveys

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Questionnaire is one of the most widely used tools for data collection due to its wide range of applications, flexibility, speed, and convenience (Taherdoost, 2016). Answers to sensitive questions are often distorted (such as evaluations of self or others, substance use, sexual activities, political opinions, unsocial attitudes) (Holtgraves, 2004; Krumpal, 2013). The respondents will go through five stages when answering a self-report: (1) Explain the question. The effect of social desirability usually operates at the final editing stage (Tourangeau and Rasinski, 1988; Sudman et al, 1997; Holtgraves, 2004). When the risks are higher than the benefits, the respondent will choose to lie (Tourangeau et al, 2000; Walzenbach, 2019).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call