Assessing Coronary Disease in Symptomatic Women by the Morise Score

Abstract

Early identification of coronary artery disease (CAD) among symptomatic women is critical given their worse outcomes as compared to men. We evaluated the value of the Morise score, a simple clinical risk score, for the assessment for CAD as determined by computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and compared it to the Diamond-Forrester risk assessment. One hundred forty women (mean age, 64±11 years) with chest pain syndromes and no known CAD referred for CTCA were analyzed. Patients were risk stratified for likelihood of CAD by Morise and Diamond-Forrester scores. The presence and degree of CAD were determined by CTCA and classified as normal, nonobstructive (<50% stenosis), or obstructive (>50% stenosis). Total coronary calcium was calculated based on Agatston scores. When risk was assessed by Morise vs. Diamond-Forrester, 5% vs. 7% of women were stratified as low, 41% vs. 82% as intermediate, and 54% vs. 11% as high risk for CAD, respectively. CAD was present in 95 (68%) patients; 22 (16%) had obstructive CAD, and 73 (52%) had nonobstructive CAD. Morise scores significantly correlated with calcium scores (p<0.001) as well as the presence and degree of CAD (p<0.0001). Morise scores also demonstrated significantly higher accuracy (66% vs. 48%, p<0.005) and higher sensitivity (56% vs. 16%, p<0.001) but lower specificity (82% vs. 97%, p<0.05) when compared to Diamond-Forrester risk assessment. The Morise score performed better than Diamond-Forrester for CAD risk assessment, which highlights the importance and power of a simple history and physical examination in determining women at risk for CAD.