Abstract

We present an index of centers of density for identifying areas of high conservation value. This index represents the average importance of an area to species occurring there as measured by comparisons of relative densities of each species among areas. We evaluated the index using collections of stream fishes from the Clinch River system above Norris Reservoir in Virginia and Tennessee (U.S.A.). A strong correlation between index values measured at the same sites at different times suggested that the index could be applied to sites without replicated samples in the region and still allow centers of density to be distinguished from noncenters. Species richness showed no relationship to the index, suggesting that conservation priorities based solely on species richness can be inadequate. A species‐accumulation curve based on the index performed nearly as well as one based on an algorithm for identifying the minimum number of sites in which all species in the region are represented. This pattern reflected the tendency of the index to weight regionally rare species more heavily than common species. But sites with high index values were not necessarily those selected by the algorithm because the algorithm used only presence/absence, whereas the index used the additional information present in relative densities. Our index represents an additional tool for identifying “hot spots” of diversity, but conservation of biodiversity over the long term will also require that the ecological integrity of regional landscape be maintained.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call