Abstract

Collaborative, project-based learning models have been shown to benefit student learning and engagement in the STEM disciplines. This case study evaluates the use of highly collaborative project- and problem-based learning models in introductory courses in the geosciences and biology. In the geosciences, we developed project-based modules with a strong local focus. Student teams worked on three project-based laboratories dealing with the local geology/geomorphology, water quality of a local stream, and local flooding issues. These replaced traditionally taught laboratories on topographic maps and rivers and streams. Student teams presented project results in lieu of taking a traditional laboratory practical. In biology, we designed a collaborative learning model that incorporated three problem-based learning modules into a first-semester introductory biology course. Students were assigned topics in evolution, cell biology and genetics to research independently during the course of the semester, with each module culminating in a brief presentation on the topic. Modules were designed to mirror concepts being covered in the lecture. Preliminary results suggest that student performance and attitudes towards course material benefitted from this learning model. The authors consider outcomes, benefits, and challenges to students and instructors.

Highlights

  • Measurable student outcomes have become increasingly important in program evaluation, accreditation and funding in higher education

  • Students who take the course enroll in three separate sections each semester: a 3 credit hour lecture that meets for 75 minutes twice a week, a 1 credit hour laboratory section that meets for 180 minutes once a week, and a discussion section that meets for 50 minutes once a week

  • In the Geosciences, students persisted at higher rates, and performed better in reformed GEOL-G 102 laboratories than in previous semesters - indicated by lower DFW rates and higher average GPAs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Measurable student outcomes have become increasingly important in program evaluation, accreditation and funding in higher education. Institutions serving historically underserved communities, non-traditional populations, and commuter campuses face special challenges providing students with accessible, meaningful, and achievable education. The goal of Re-Imagining the First Year (RFY) is to improve the quality of learning and the first year student experience at member institutions (AASCU, 2018b) through addressing student needs and removing obstacles to academic success. One set of initiatives involves increasing faculty pedagogical expertise and widely incorporating modern, evidence-based techniques into the freshman-level curriculum (AASCU, 2016). The goal of the PIG was to provide an outlet for interested faculty to explore, discuss, and evaluate the use of modern, evidence-based pedagogy. As the PIG progressed, participants began to develop ways in which broad ideas could be adapted to benefit general education and freshman-gateway courses in their disciplines. We present results from interventions developed for the geosciences and biology

Background
Findings
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call