Abstract
This study examines several psychological reports to verify whether consultant psychologists use scientifically based procedures during clinical assessment of sexually abused children. To address our aims, first we propose a methodological premise on mixed-method approaches and on the methodological appropriateness paradigm. We then provide a content analysis (run using the T-LAB software) of psychological reports produced by a sample of Italian consultant psychologists. Results show a biased use of some word associations that may lead to confirmatory interpretations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
