Abstract

Fish surveys form the backbone of reef monitoring and management initiatives throughout the tropics, and understanding patterns in biases between techniques is crucial if outputs are to address key objectives optimally. Often biases are not consistent across natural environmental gradients such as depth, leading to uncertainty in interpretation of results. Recently there has been much interest in mesophotic reefs (reefs from 30–150 m depth) as refuge habitats from fishing pressure, leading to many comparisons of reef fish communities over depth gradients. Here we compare fish communities using stereo-video footage recorded via baited remote underwater video (BRUV) and diver-operated video (DOV) systems on shallow and mesophotic reefs in the Mesoamerican Barrier Reef, Caribbean. We show inconsistent responses across families, species and trophic groups between methods across the depth gradient. Fish species and family richness were higher using BRUV at both depth ranges, suggesting that BRUV is more appropriate for recording all components of the fish community. Fish length distributions were not different between methods on shallow reefs, yet BRUV recorded more small fish on mesophotic reefs. However, DOV consistently recorded greater relative fish community biomass of herbivores, suggesting that studies focusing on herbivores should consider using DOV. Our results highlight the importance of considering what component of reef fish community researchers and managers are most interested in surveying when deciding which survey technique to use across natural gradients such as depth.

Highlights

  • When conducting ecological monitoring programs it is important to select an appropriate sampling method

  • We tested for differences in species richness between sites, depths and methods (S2 Table), finding that there were significant site:method interactions and depth:method interactions, suggesting that identified differences in fish species richness between sites is affected by survey method, but more importantly that the difference in species richness recorded by baited remote underwater video (BRUV) and diver-operated video (DOV) is affected by depth

  • Mean species richness was greatest on shallows reefs for both methods, declining 64% for BRUV and 63% for DOV when compared to mesophotic reefs (Fig 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When conducting ecological monitoring programs it is important to select an appropriate sampling method. Within coral reef fish assessments it is well known that all sampling methods suffer from biases [1,2], yet it is often crucial to have accurate data on fish species. Comparing BRUV and DOV Fish Community Surveys on Shallow and Mesophotic Reefs role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ’authors contributions’ section

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call