Abstract

Joint encounter (JE) models estimate demographic rates using live recapture and dead recovery data. The extent to which limited recapture or recovery data can hinder estimation in JE models is not completely understood. Yet limited data are common in ecological research. We designed a series of simulations using Bayesian multistate JE models that spanned a large range of potential recapture probabilities (0.01–0.90) and two reported mortality probabilities (0.10, 0.19). We calculated bias by comparing estimates against known probabilities of survival, fidelity and reported mortality. We explored whether sparse data (i.e., recapture probabilities <0.02) compromised inference about survival by comparing estimates from dead recovery (DR) and JE models using an 18-year data set from a migratory bird, the lesser snow goose (Anser caerulescens caerulescens). Our simulations showed that bias in probabilities of survival, fidelity and reported mortality was relatively low across a large range of recapture probabilities, except when recapture and reported mortality probabilities were both lowest. While bias in fidelity probability was similar across all recapture probabilities, the root mean square error declined substantially with increased recapture probabilities for reported mortality probabilities of 0.10 or 0.19, as expected. In our case study, annual survival probabilities for adult female snow geese were similar whether estimated with JE or DR models, but more precise from JE models than those from DR models. Thus, our simulated and empirical data suggest acceptably minimal bias in survival, fidelity or reported mortality probabilities estimated from JE models. Even a small amount of recapture information provided adequate structure for JE models, except when reported mortality probabilities were <0.10. Thus, practitioners with limited recapture data should not be discouraged from use of JE models. We recommend that ecologists incorporate other data types as frequently as analytically possible, since precision of focal parameters is improved, and additional parameters of interest can be estimated.

Highlights

  • Joint encounter (JE) models provide a unified framework for ecologists and evolutionary biologists to incorporate information from live recaptures and dead recoveries from the same sample of marked organisms (Burnham, 1993; Lebreton et al, 1995)

  • We developed JE and dead recovery (DR) models using an 18-year data set for snow geese to estimate F, and compare S from models with and without recapture information to determine if precision was improved when recapture data were included

  • Simulations Generally, bias and RMSE in survival, fidelity and reported mortality probabilities estimated from simulated data and JE models were low across our range in probabilities of recapture (i.e., 0.01–0.90) and reported mortality (i.e., 0.10–0.19)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Joint encounter (JE) models provide a unified framework for ecologists and evolutionary biologists to incorporate information from live recaptures and dead recoveries from the same sample of marked organisms (Burnham, 1993; Lebreton et al, 1995). Information entered into JE models includes whether an individual is seen alive, reported dead or not seen during a defined sampling period, and imperfect detection can be explicitly modelled and accounted for. Ecologists have adapted these models to the Bayesian and/or multistate frameworks (Barker, White & McDougall, 2005; Kendall, Conn & Hines, 2006; Kéry & Schaub, 2012; Lebreton, Almeras & Pradel, 1999), which permits inclusion of prior information as well as calculation of probabilities from state transition and observation matrices for more robust estimation. Recent JE models are flexible for a variety of objectives and research questions

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call