Assessing antiviral potency of anti-HIV therapies in vivo by comparing viral decay rates in viral dynamic models.

Abstract

A virologic marker, the number of HIV RNA copies or viral load, is currently used to evaluate anti-HIV therapies in AIDS clinical trials. This marker can be used to assess the antiviral potency of therapies, but is easily affected by noncompliance, drug resistance, toxicities, and other factors during the long-term treatment evaluation process. Recently it has been suggested to use viral dynamics to assess the potency of antiviral drugs and therapies, since viral decay rates in viral dynamic models have been shown to be related to the antiviral drug potency directly, and they need a shorter evaluation time. In this paper we first review the two statistical approaches for characterizing HIV dynamics and estimating viral decay rates: the individual nonlinear least squares regression (INLS) method and the population nonlinear mixed-effect model (PMEM) approach. To compare the viral decay rates between two treatment arms, parametric and nonparametric tests, based on the estimates of viral decay rates (the derived variables) from both the INLS and PMEM methods, are proposed and studied. We show, using the concept of exchangeability, that the test based on the empirical Bayes' estimates from the PMEM is valid, powerful and robust. This proposed method is very useful in most practical cases where the INLS-based tests and the general likelihood ratio test may not apply. We validate and compare various tests for finite samples using Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, we apply the proposed tests to an AIDS clinical trial to compare the antiviral potency between a 3-drug combination regimen and a 4-drug combination regimen. The proposed tests provide some significant evidence that the 4-drug regimen is more potent than the 3-drug regimen, while the naive methods fail to give a significant result.*To whom correspondence should be addressed.