Abstract
This research presents the assessments of IEQ in 13 naturally ventilated urban residential dwellings based on the long-term monitoring of CO2, PM2.5, formaldehyde, temperature, and relative humidity within a year. In addition to the costly monitoring techniques, we utilized time series prediction methods as an economical and efficient approach to comprehend the quality of indoor environment. Nevertheless, choosing a prediction method proves to be a challenge due to the inconclusive nature of the advantages and disadvantages associated with various methodologies. Thus, we conducted a comprehensive comparison of the LSTM, SVM, ARIMA, and BPNN algorithms for predicting IEQ. The results indicate that for short-term prediction (one day), the SVM algorithm has the shortest fitting time, the program occupies the least memory, and the overfitting problem is not readily apparent, while the prediction accuracy is acceptable. Long-term (one year) predictions can be executed with greater precision using LSTM. In regard to robustness, prediction time and accuracy of SVM in different dwellings varies greatly and the robustness is weak. When considering parameters, the discrepancy between the prediction error of PM2.5 and the sensor error is more pronounced, resulting in an even lower level of predictability. As for the input data, it was observed that the computation time of the four algorithms increased linearly with the sample size. While the accuracy of predictions is predominantly influenced by the sampling frequency of the original data. The investigation results will benefit future decision-making and control strategies regarding the enhancement of thermal comfort and indoor air quality.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.