Abstract

Sexually transmitted microbes are hypothesized to influence the evolution of reproductive strategies. Though frequently discussed in this context, our understanding of the reproductive microbiome is quite nascent. Indeed, testing this hypothesis first requires establishing a baseline understanding of the temporal dynamics of the reproductive microbiome and of how individual variation in reproductive behavior and age influence the assembly and maintenance of the reproductive microbiome as a whole. Here, we ask how mating activity, breeding stage, and age influence the reproductive microbiome. We use observational and experimental approaches to explain variation in the cloacal microbiome of free‐living, female tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Using microsatellite‐based parentage analyses, we determined the number of sires per brood (a proxy for female mating activity). We experimentally increased female sexual activity by administering exogenous 17ß‐estradiol. Lastly, we used bacterial 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to characterize the cloacal microbiome. Neither the number of sires per brood nor the increased sexual activity of females significantly influenced female cloacal microbiome richness or community structure. Female age, however, was positively correlated with cloacal microbiome richness and influenced overall community structure. A hypothesis to explain these patterns is that the effect of sexual activity and the number of mates on variation in the cloacal microbiome manifests over an individual's lifetime. Additionally, we found that cloacal microbiome alpha diversity (Shannon Index, Faith's phylogenetic distance) decreased and community structure shifted between breeding stages. This is one of few studies to document within‐individual changes and age‐related differences in the cloacal microbiome across successive breeding stages. More broadly, our results contribute to our understanding of the role that host life history and behavior play in shaping the cloacal microbiomes of wild birds.

Highlights

  • The social and reproductive behavior of animals can shape the diverse microbial communities (“microbiomes”) that live in and on their bodies (Archie & Tung, 2015; Dugatkin, 2020; Ezenwa et al, 2012; Münger et al, 2018; Westneat, 1987)

  • Within-­individual changes in the phylogenetic diversity of male cloacal bacteria between breeding and nonbreeding stages suggest that physiology and overall breeding condition may play a role in shaping the cloacal microbiome (Escallón et al, 2019)

  • We combined robust observational and experimental approaches to test the hypotheses that the number of sires per brood and increased sexual activity of females via experimentally elevated estradiol concentrations significantly influence the richness and community structure of the female cloacal microbiome

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

The social and reproductive behavior of animals can shape the diverse microbial communities (“microbiomes”) that live in and on their bodies (Archie & Tung, 2015; Dugatkin, 2020; Ezenwa et al, 2012; Münger et al, 2018; Westneat, 1987). Considerable theoretical work has explored the potential transmission of microbes through mating (Boots & Knell, 2002; Graves & Duvall, 1995; Hamilton, 1990; Kokko et al, 2002; Lockhart et al, 1996; Loehle, 1995; Lombardo, 1998; Lombardo et al, 1999; Poiani, 2010; Sheldon, 1993; Thrall et al, 1997, 2000), but relatively few empirical studies focusing on the reproductive microbiome of wild animals exist. The cloacal bacterial communities of tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) social partners were not more similar than expected by chance (Hernandez et al, 2020) These studies have not focused on variation in sexual activity and the number of sexual partners, two factors that are hypothesized to contribute to variation in cloacal microbiome diversity. We predicted that females implanted with exogenous estradiol would more actively solicit copulations, both from their social mate and from other males, and would have higher cloacal microbiome richness compared to control females

| METHODS
| Study design
Experimental study
| Experimental study
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call