Abstract
The passive hemagglutination (PHA) test and a modified indirect immunofluorescence (IF) test were compared with the standard hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) test for the assay of rubella antibody. For sera from healthy individuals with or without detectable rubella antibody the agreement between the new and the standard procedure was 96.4% for the PHA and 98.1% for the IF test. In rubella patients with serologic confirmation by HI, the IF test detected significant rises in 219 (99.1%) of 221 patients and the PHA test detected antibody conversion in 68 (93%) of 73 patients. In some circumstances the PHA or the IF test may facilitate a presumptive or definitive diagnosis. Absence of PHA reactions in single sera from patients with HI antibody was often (41% of such cases) an early indication of current rubella infection. IF antibody increased more gradually than HI antibody in rubella patients, and diagnostic IF titer rises were observed in several cases when HI titers had reached a plateau.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
