Abstract
BackgroundTroponin assays are used in the diagnosis of myocardial injury and may show elevated results for a variety of reasons. However it is increasingly recognised that cardiac troponin elevation may in some cases be due to assay interference. This is of significant importance as a misdiagnosis of myocardial injury may lead to unnecessary and potentially harmful investigation and treatment for patients. We sought to confirm the accuracy of cardiac high sensitivity troponin T (chsTnT) elevation in an unselected group of patients presenting to the emergency department, by using a second confirmatory cardiac high sensitivity troponin I (chsTnI) assay. MethodsWe identified patients presenting to two local emergency departments over a five-day period who had chsTnT levels measured as part of routine clinical care. All samples with elevated chsTnT levels (above the 99% centile URL) were retested for chsTnI in order to confirm true myocardial injury. ResultsA total of 74 samples from 54 patients were analysed for chsTnT and chsTnI. 7 samples (9.5%) had chsTnI levels < 5 ng/L suggesting assay interference as the cause of chsTnT elevation. ConclusionsAssay interference leading to false positive troponin elevation may be more common than many physicians appreciate and can potentially lead to harmful investigation and treatment for patients. In cases where the diagnosis of myocardial injury is uncertain, a second alternative troponin assay should be performed to confirm true myocardial injury.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.