Aspirin Compared to Other Thromboprophylactic Agents in Patients Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Literature Review.

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common but major surgery performed in the United Kingdom and around the globe. THA is associated with several postoperative complications, with one of the most common being venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the form of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). VTE following orthopaedic surgery can have major consequences in terms of patient morbidity and may even cause mortality. It carries a significant cost to the health service, and thromboprophylactic agents are used to decrease the risk. Several different options are available for chemical thromboprophylaxis, including aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and warfarin. This study aims to review the literature to determine if aspirin is less superior to the other available chemical thromboprophylaxis in postoperative patients following THA. The primary outcome assessed in this review is rates of symptomatic 90-day VTE in the form of PE or DVT. A literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using the following terms: 'Aspirin AND (low molecular weight heparin OR LMWH OR Enoxaparin OR Apixaban OR DOAC OR direct oral anticoagulant OR warfarin) AND (orthopaedic OR orthopedic) AND (Total hip replacement OR THR OR THA OR total hip arthroplasty) AND ('venous thromboembolism' OR VTE).' Aspirin appears to have promising results as thromboprophylaxis in cases of THA. However, it is still up for debate as to whether it is non-inferior to other forms of thromboprophylaxis.