Abstract
Despite nominal acknowledgment, archaeologists have been slow to take advantage of neo‐Darwinian evolutionary theory (NDT) in the course of their research. While perhaps understandable for those working in later prehistory, where quasi‐historical explanations for process can sometimes be invoked, archaeologists working in ‘deep time’ have also shown a marked reluctance to use it. This essay asks why this is so, and goes on to apply NDT concepts in an effort to reconstruct aspects of early hominid sociality. Local group size and composition, sex‐based dispersal at maturity, sexual selection and mating practices, kinship, enculturation, primate cognitive abilities and the social context of learning are addressed using an eclectic approach in which non‐human primate data, sociological data on modern human mating practices and human paleontology play important roles.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
