Abstract

BackgroundPreeclampsia (PE) is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy associated with high maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality and increased future risk of cardiovascular complications. ObjectiveTo analyze whether women who have had PE with severe features in their pregnancy have higher arterial stiffness (AS) parameters than those whose PE course was without signs of severity. MethodsSixty-five women who developed PE during their gestation were evaluated, divided into two groups: PE group without severe features or non-severe PE (n=30) and PE group with severe features or severe PE (n=35). Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), central augmentation index corrected to a heart rate of 75 beats per minute (AIxc75) and central augmentation pressure (cAP) were determined one month and six months postpartum. Comparison of proportions was carried out using the chi-square test, comparison of means between groups using the Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney test, and comparison of means of the same group at different evolutionary moments, using the t-test or the Wilcoxon test. Correlation, with and between hemodynamic parameters, was carried out with Spearman's correlation coefficient and the association between demographic variables, personal history and hemodynamic parameters, and altered arterial stiffness parameters was carried out using linear and logistic regression models. ResultsWomen with severe PE presented, both at 1 and 6 months postpartum, higher values of blood pressure, both central and peripheral, as well as AR and pulse amplification parameters, than those women whose PE was not severe. Central augmentation index (cAIx) values at 1 month and 6 months postpartum were higher, although not significantly, in the severe PE group compared to the non-severe PE group (24.0 (16.5-34.3) vs. 19.0% (14-29) and 24.0 (14.0-30.0) vs. 20.0% (12.3-26.8), respectively). Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) was significantly higher at both 1 and 6 months postpartum in the severe PE group compared to the non-severe PE group (10.2 (8.8-10.7) vs. 8.8m/s (8.3-9.6) and 10.0 (8.8-10.6) vs. 8.8m/s (8.3-9.3), respectively). Central systolic pressure and central pulse pressure amplification were also higher, although not significantly, in the severe PE group in comparison with the non-severe PE group. ConclusionsWomen who have had severe PE have more pronounced arterial stiffness parameters than those in whom PE was not particularly severe. The determination of cAIx and cfPWV, as a strategy for the assessment of cardiovascular risk, should be evaluated among women who have had PE.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call