Abstract
Abstract In this article, I show an important connection between global financial governance and Asian regional financial governance. My findings suggest that unless the G7-dominated global financial institutions resolve the legitimacy problems, which involve inclusiveness, rulegovernance, and fair returns, Asian developing countries are unlikely to place whole stock in global solutions created to deal with global (and regional) financial issues. The perceived deficiency of political legitimacy, even in the post–Asian crisis global financial architecture, drives Asian countries to become rule makers rather than rule takers through the new regional financial arrangements, such as the Bilateral Swap Arrangement under the Chiang Mai Initiative and the Asian Bond Fund.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
