Abstract

In this work we focus our attention on micro-scale textural observations and chemical analysis of the surface of ash particles erupted from ordinary activity at Stromboli volcano (Aeolian Islands, Italy). Ashes are related to three vent systems: NE1, NE2 and SW showing different eruptive styles. Samples were collected during three campaigns: 1-5 September 2008; 20, 22 September 2008 and 18 June 2009, with two different methods: collection on a clean surface downwind and use of remotely controlled, electrically propelled aeromodels, which penetrate directly in the eruptive plume and collect ash samples that are less affected by transport-related sorting processes. A micro-textural approach has been conducted working at step: from preliminary observations under binocular microscope on a medium number of 700 particles, to thin sections and sub-micron investigations, using high resolution instruments. Micro-texture and morphology of ash particles were observed under FE-SEM, at high magnification (30,000/50,000×) measuring the main shape parameters (area, perimeter, max length, compactness, Feret’s diameter, Heywood’s diameter and elongation). Ashes are made up by a wide spectrum of fragments whose end-members are represented by two main textural types with different colour, shape, internal textures and vesicularity named “Type a” and “Type b”. “Type a” shows great similarities with fragments called “tachilite” while “Type b” fragments are very similar to the named “sideromelane” fragments. Fragments with intermediate textural features are present and named as “Type a1” and “Type b1”, respectively. The relative abundances of each type of fragments greatly vary in samples collected from different groups of vents. Chemical analysis of the external surfaces indicates that all the different grain types underwent alteration phenomena and precipitation of neo-formation minerals on their surfaces. The alteration is dependent from the atmospheric conditions around the vent and not from the type of fragments. During the periods of sampling, ash erupted from individual explosions of different vents, does not show big differences in morphology and chemistry of surface features, but mainly in terms of relative proportion of fragments. “Type b” fragments predominate in the ash erupted from typical strombolian activity whereas “Type a” fragments are ubiquitous.

Highlights

  • Understanding the eruptive dynamic of persistent explosive activity of volcanoes is a formidable task

  • Analyses on ash from single explosions erupted during the ordinary activity at Stromboli volcano on May and September 2002, September 2008 and June 2009 revealed that ash is made up by two main type of ash fragments: one opaque, black, poorly vesiculated, equant in shape and with micro-crystalline groundmass, here called “Type a”; and the other transparent, light brown to dark or yellow, highly vesiculated, with shards morphologies, sub-aphyric groundmass with plagioclase micro- and phenocrysts: “Type b”

  • Component analyses of ash erupted during ordinary activity at Stromboli volcano revealed the presence of two main categories of fragments (“Type a” or tachylite and “Type b” or sideromelane), single crystals and lithics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding the eruptive dynamic of persistent explosive activity of volcanoes is a formidable task. The eruptions involve a vast range of scales, types and property of fragments and are characterized by complex interaction of physical and chemical processes occurring in conduits, vents and in the atmosphere. The shape and nature of ash particles hold clues about the magma fragmentation processes and the stability of volcanic conduit [1]-[3]. At Mt. Etna, morphological and component analysis of ash, and further comparison of these data with those from other monitoring techniques, demonstrated a clear relationship between ash features and styles of explosive activity [11] [12]. At Stromboli, ash erupted from different vents during just a few hours of activity may show a strong variability in terms of component abundances, degree and type of alteration and crystallinity [12]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.