Abstract

Recent studies evaluating the community structures of microorganisms and macroorganisms have found greater diversity and rarity within micro-scale communities, compared to macro-scale communities. However, reproductive method has been a confounding factor in these comparisons; the microbes considered generally reproduce asexually, while the macroorganisms considered generally reproduce sexually. Sexual reproduction imposes the constraint of mate finding, which can have significant demographic consequences by depressing birth rates at low population sizes. First, I construct an island biogeography model to study the organization of ecological communities under neutral stochastic processes. Then, I examine theoretically how the effects of mate finding in sexual populations translate to the emergent community properties of diversity, rarity, and dominance (size of the largest population). In mate-limited sexual populations, the decreased growth rates at low population densities translate to a higher extinction rate; this increased extinction rate had a disproportionately strong effect on taxa with low population densities. Thus, mate limitation decreased diversity, primarily by excluding small populations from communities. However, the most abundant taxa were minimally affected by mate limitation. Therefore, mate limitation affected the diversity and rarity of taxa in communities but did not alter the dominance of the largest population. The observed shifts in community structure mirror recent empirical studies of micro-scale versus macro-scale communities, which have shown that microbial communities have greater diversity and rarity than macrobial communities but are not different in dominance. Thus, reproductive method may contribute to observed differences in emergent properties between communities at these two scales.IMPORTANCE There have been numerous recent efforts to integrate microbes into broad-scale ecological theories. Microbial communities are often structurally distinct from macrobial communities, but it is unclear whether these differences are real or whether they are due to the different methodologies used to study communities at these two scales. One major difference between macroorganisms and microorganisms is that microbes are much more likely to reproduce asexually. Sexually reproducing taxa have diminished growth rates at low population size, because they must encounter another member of their species before reproducing. This study shows that communities of asexually reproducing taxa are expected to be more diverse, because taxa persist longer. Furthermore, asexually reproducing taxa can exist at much lower densities than sexually reproducing taxa. Thus, asexual reproduction by microbes can account for two major differences between microbial and macrobial communities, namely, greater diversity and greater prevalence of rare taxa for microbes.

Highlights

  • IMPORTANCE There have been numerous recent efforts to integrate microbes into broad-scale ecological theories

  • In the simulated populations with asexual reproduction, it is highly unlikely that a death will occur when the population size is small

  • This study presents a stochastic framework for studying the assembly of microbial communities and further shows that mate limitation influences emergent community properties, including diversity and average population size

Read more

Summary

Introduction

IMPORTANCE There have been numerous recent efforts to integrate microbes into broad-scale ecological theories. It is difficult to tease apart the multiple characteristics that are confounded between micro- and macro-scale communities (such as generation time, per-capita growth rates, and body size) to determine the underlying causes of the differing community organizations. For this reason, mathematical models are useful to separate the effects of confounded traits, because a single trait can be evaluated in isolation. Many previous theoretical models have considered mate finding and Allee effects by using deterministic models, such as differential or difference equations, to describe the population growth rate [11, 13, 14].

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.