Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that a biphasic defibrillation waveform with an ascending first phase (ASC) causes less myocardial damage by pathology and injury current than a standard biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform in a swine model. Although lifesaving, defibrillation shocks have significant iatrogenic effects that reduce their benefit for patient survival. An ASC waveform with an 8-ms linear ramp followed by an additional positive 0.5-ms decaying portion withamplitudes of 20J (ASC 20J) and 25J (ASC 25J) was used. The control was a 25-J BTE conventional waveform (BTE25J) RESULTS: The ASC 20J and ASC 25J shocks were both successful in 6 of 6 pigs, but the BTE 25J was successful in only 6of 14 pigs (p<0.05). Post-shock ST-segment elevation (injury current) in the right ventricular electrode was significantly greater with BTE 25J than with ASC 20J and ASC 25J. With a blinded pathology reading, hemorrhage, inflammation, thrombi, and necrosis 24h post-shock were significantly greater with BTE 25J than with ASC 20J and ASC 25J. Troponin levels were also markedly lower at 3, 4, 5, and 6h post-shock. Defibrillation shocks cause electrophysiological, histological, and biochemical signs of myocardial damage and necrosis. These signs of damage are markedly less for an ASC waveform than for a conventional BTEwaveform.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call