Abstract

Popular consent is an essential element for success and stability of democracies. Research has repeatedly demonstrated that “electoral winners” (i.e. voters casting a ballot for government parties) are more satisfied with democracy than supporters of the opposition parties. However, little is known about the dynamics of satisfaction during the electoral cycle: Do winners become happier and losers even more discontent over time? We approach this question by utilizing an interview date in the European Social Survey (rounds 1–8) to position individuals within the different stages of electoral cycle. The results based on 199,207 responses from 199 surveys in 31 countries suggest that satisfaction with democracy stays relatively stable during the electoral cycle across various electoral systems if the political development is predictable. However, if actions of the parties are uncertain, namely the alternations of governments tend to be frequent, partial, and opened to all parties, and hence neither winners nor losers know how steady their status is with respect to the political development in the country, their satisfaction tend to fluctuate over time. Therefore, the conclusion reached is the more stable West European democracies have limited generalizability to the low-predictable systems in Central and Eastern Europe.

Highlights

  • Voter satisfaction with democracy, an essential element in the sustainability of democratic regimes (Bernhard et al, 2001; Easton, 1965; Mainwaring, 2006), has attracted enduring scholarly attention

  • This suggests that the gap in satisfaction between winners and losers remains throughout the electoral cycle

  • These results suggest that winners are still significantly more satisfied than losers and the gap tends to expand with increasing electoral system disproportionality; after controlling for other potential confounders, the individual and survey level in model 5, the effect of disproportionality loses statistical significance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An essential element in the sustainability of democratic regimes (Bernhard et al, 2001; Easton, 1965; Mainwaring, 2006), has attracted enduring scholarly attention. Since it is precisely the vote choice that distinguishes the electoral winners from losers, the stability of the party system and resulting political predictability represent two major elements within a political context which should influence the overall degree of satisfaction with democracy and its (in)stability over time (Figure 1).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call