Abstract

Resumo Diante do déficit habitacional, a gestão pública de diversos países procura atender a demanda por moradia a partir de parcerias com a iniciativa privada. Neste contexto, o artigo tem como objetivo compreender e comparar a aplicabilidade das Parcerias Público-Privadas (PPPs) no Brasil e Estados Unidos, através de estudos de caso do Programa Parceria Público-Privada Habitacional em São Paulo e do Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program em Nova York. Utiliza-se o Método Arquitetura Dialógica, que relaciona o objeto de estudo com seu contexto. Para a análise comparativa de ambos os programas foram utilizados os seguintes parâmetros: a) legislação e normativa; b) agentes envolvidos; c) beneficiários; d) financiamento ou auxílio para locação da unidade de habitação; e) localização dos empreendimentos ou da oferta das unidades; f) tipologias de habitação. Os resultados mostram que ambos os programas apresentam potencialidades e restrições quanto ao emprego das PPPs para a oferta de habitação à população de baixa renda. A pesquisa contribui com os estudos sobre habitação social através das PPPs.

Highlights

  • The demand for housing in the 21st century can be elucidated by data from the United Nations (2017), which introduce the rising global population with projections of 8.6 billion people for 2030, 9.8 billion for 2050, and 11.2 billion for 2100

  • Seen as a source of real estate investments, housing has the function of meeting users' needs and of connecting to the characteristics of its context

  • The present study considers as Context: housing policies and programmes until implementation of Private Partnerships (PPPs) in São Paulo (Brazil) and New York (United States)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The demand for housing in the 21st century can be elucidated by data from the United Nations (2017), which introduce the rising global population with projections of 8.6 billion people for 2030, 9.8 billion for 2050, and 11.2 billion for 2100. In South America, in Brazil, the housing shortage estimate was 6.355 million housing units in 2015 (FUNDAÇÃO JOÃO PINHEIRO, 2018). In the United States, the housing shortage reached 7.3 million units between the years 2000 and 2015 (GERRITY, 2018). It is seen as a merchandise, i.e. a physical good resulting from investments and actions, whose access is limited to people with purchasing power and right to use. Seen as a source of real estate investments, housing has the function of meeting users' needs and of connecting to the characteristics of its context

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call