Abstract

Unconventional oil and gas reservoirs from the lower Palaeozoic basin at the western slope of the East European Craton were taken into account in this study. The aim was to supply and improve standard well logs interpretation based on machine learning methods, especially ANNs. ANNs were used on standard well logging data, e.g. P-wave velocity, density, resistivity, neutron porosity, radioactivity and photoelectric factor. During the calculations, information about lithology or stratigraphy was not taken into account. We apply different methods of classification: cluster analysis, support vector machine and artificial neural network—Kohonen algorithm. We compare the results and analyse obtained electrofacies. Machine learning method–support vector machine SVM was used for classification. For the same data set, SVM algorithm application results were compared to the results of the Kohonen algorithm. The results were very similar. We obtained very good agreement of results. Kohonen algorithm (ANN) was used for pattern recognition and identification of electrofacies. Kohonen algorithm was also used for geological interpretation of well logs data. As a result of Kohonen algorithm application, groups corresponding to the gas-bearing intervals were found. Analysis showed diversification between gas-bearing formations and surrounding beds. It is also shown that internal diversification in gas-saturated beds is present. It is concluded that ANN appeared to be a useful and quick tool for preliminary classification of members and gas-saturated identification.

Highlights

  • In recent years, machine learning methods have been used more and more successfully in petrophysical issues

  • Electrofacies are based on log responses in the scale according to sampling rate of well logging while facies description based on cores are often in millimetres scale

  • More detailed results were obtained from artificial neural networks (ANN) that’s why in an interpretation part we focused on it

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Machine learning methods have been used more and more successfully in petrophysical issues. The use of artificial neural networks for both classification and prediction has become a tool supporting comprehensive interpretation of well logging data (Hair et al 2006; Szabó 2011; Szabó et al 2013; Puskarczyk et al 2015; Puskarczyk 2018). The term electrofacies was introduced by Serra and Abbott in 1980. They defined electrofacies as the set of log responses which characterizes a bed and permits this to be distinguished from others. The most important step for electrofacies determination is core and log data integration. Electrofacies are based on log responses in the scale according to sampling rate of well logging while facies description based on cores are often in millimetres scale. We have to realize that electrofacies analysis given as general information about rock properties changes and can be used for pattern recognition in geological profiles of wells

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call