Abstract
[Figure: see text] Building on Brian Cantwell Smith’s distinction between computational reckoning and intentional judgment in the three-step development of artificial intelligence, remarks are offered that assess the strengths and limitations of artificial intelligence in the formulation of hypothesis about the natural, human, and religious dimensions of world process. By comparing human inquiry with the gap between reckoning and intentional judgment, the role of intelligence as supervening on progressively organized data is highlighted and related to human participation in transcendent providence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
