Abstract
This article discusses the potential infringement of articles 24(4) and 24(5) of the OECD Model by domestic thin capitalization rules. Given the purpose of such rules, they are often targeted at cross-border transactions, as a result of which tax treaty discrimination issues may arise. However, because of the intricate relationship between the non-discrimination provisions and the treaty provisions governing the arm’s length nature of transactions between related enterprises, the discrimination analysis may not always be entirely straightforward.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.