Abstract
Article 22 of the GDPR can either be understood as a prohibition or as a data subject right. How one decides has far-reaching consequences both for the persons concerned and for the companies or public authorities that use such decision-making systems. Scholars have presented different arguments in favour of one or the other interpretation. However, with a few notable exceptions, comprehensive analyses of all relevant arguments are still missing. This paper contributes to fill this gap and attempts to complete the picture by adding two novel and important aspects: First, a systematic perspective that connects Article 22 GDPR to the future European Artificial Intelligence Act and second, a thorough teleological interpretation of Article 22 GDPR. Both these aspects tip the balance in favour of a data subject right.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
