Arthroscopic Implantation of Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction Improves Cartilage Regeneration and Pain Relief in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Abstract

PurposeTo compare the pain relief and cartilage repair status of patients with knee osteoarthritis who received arthroscopic treatment with or without stromal vascular fraction (SVF) implantation.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the patients who were examined with 12-month follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after arthroscopic treatment for knee osteoarthritis from September 2019 to April 2021. Patients were included in this study if they had grade 3 or 4 knee osteoarthritis according to the Outerbridge classification in MRI. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used for pain assessment over the follow-up period (baseline and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups). Cartilage repair was evaluated using follow-up MRIs based on Outerbridge grades and the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue scoring system.ResultsAmong 97 patients who received arthroscopic treatment, 54 patients received arthroscopic treatment alone (conventional group) and 43 received arthroscopic treatment along with SVF implantation (SVF group). In the conventional group, the mean VAS score decreased significantly at 1-month post-treatment compared with baseline (P < .05), and gradually increased from 3 to 12 months’ post-treatment (all P < .05). In the SVF group, the mean VAS score decreased until 12 months post-treatment compared with baseline (all P < .05 except P = .780 in 1-month vs 3-month follow-ups). Significantly greater pain relief was reported in the SVF group than in the conventional group at 6 and 12 months’ post-treatment (all P < .05). Overall, Outerbridge grades were significantly greater in the SVF group than in the conventional group (P < .001). Similarly, mean Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue scores were significantly greater (P < .001) in the SVF group (70.5 ± 11.1) than in the conventional group (39.7 ± 8.2).ConclusionsThe results regarding pain improvement and cartilage regeneration and the significant correlation between pain and MRI outcomes at 12-months follow-up indicate that the arthroscopic SVF implantation technique may be useful for repairing cartilage lesions in knee osteoarthritis.Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study. To compare the pain relief and cartilage repair status of patients with knee osteoarthritis who received arthroscopic treatment with or without stromal vascular fraction (SVF) implantation. We retrospectively evaluated the patients who were examined with 12-month follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after arthroscopic treatment for knee osteoarthritis from September 2019 to April 2021. Patients were included in this study if they had grade 3 or 4 knee osteoarthritis according to the Outerbridge classification in MRI. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used for pain assessment over the follow-up period (baseline and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups). Cartilage repair was evaluated using follow-up MRIs based on Outerbridge grades and the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue scoring system. Among 97 patients who received arthroscopic treatment, 54 patients received arthroscopic treatment alone (conventional group) and 43 received arthroscopic treatment along with SVF implantation (SVF group). In the conventional group, the mean VAS score decreased significantly at 1-month post-treatment compared with baseline (P < .05), and gradually increased from 3 to 12 months’ post-treatment (all P < .05). In the SVF group, the mean VAS score decreased until 12 months post-treatment compared with baseline (all P < .05 except P = .780 in 1-month vs 3-month follow-ups). Significantly greater pain relief was reported in the SVF group than in the conventional group at 6 and 12 months’ post-treatment (all P < .05). Overall, Outerbridge grades were significantly greater in the SVF group than in the conventional group (P < .001). Similarly, mean Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue scores were significantly greater (P < .001) in the SVF group (70.5 ± 11.1) than in the conventional group (39.7 ± 8.2). The results regarding pain improvement and cartilage regeneration and the significant correlation between pain and MRI outcomes at 12-months follow-up indicate that the arthroscopic SVF implantation technique may be useful for repairing cartilage lesions in knee osteoarthritis.