Arthroscopic chronic tennis elbow surgery preserves elbow proprioception

Abstract

Study designRetrospective cohort study. IntroductionA new method of accurately assessing the compromised elbow's proprioception was developed for this postsurgical population using information from previous neurophysiologic proprioception studies of healthy elbows. HypothesisThis retrospective cohort study investigated the patterns and the degree of proprioceptive impairment and recovery following arthroscopic surgery for chronic lateral epicondylitis. Material and methodsParticipants had undergone arthroscopic elbow surgery two years prior to this study (n=15). Healthy, non-injured volunteers with similar demographics (n=15) served as controls. Both groups were evaluated using quantitative measures of joint position sense for proprioceptive functioning. In order to obtain the most accurate proprioceptive measurements, interindividual interaction and visual input biases were eliminated. Retrospective chart reviews were performed to compare qualitative self-reported measures of proprioceptive function in arthroscopic surgery patients before surgery and two years post-surgery. ResultsActive and passive joint repositioning outcome measurements were similar between groups (p>0.05). No significant differences were found among any angles except one: passive joint position sense at 120° of flexion (p<0.05). At this angle, the arthroscopy group showed greater deviation from target angles than the control group. The novel proprioceptive testing method we developed was found to be accurate and reliable. DiscussionOutcomes of arthroscopic treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis with no decortication yielded outcomes measure similar to those of healthy controls. The sole significant difference was at 120° flexion passive joint repositioning, with a higher negative angular deviation from the target point. We propose that our study results and specific proprioception method may have implications for improving accuracy of future elbow arthroscopy and proprioceptive recovery in this population. Level of evidenceII, low-powered prospective randomized trial.