Arthroscopic approach in initial training: Study of a novice cohort using inverse direct and indirect approaches and its implication in the development of training programs

Abstract

IntroductionArthroscopic training includes successive stages of observation, reproduction and then repetition. Learning through simulation in 2D virtual reality makes it possible to repeat these different stages to enhance the learner's experience in complete safety and a shorter timeframe. Some procedures require inversion of the optical and instrumental approaches in the axial plane, disrupting the existing psychomotor and technical skills. The objective of this study was to compare the degree of difficulty and the distribution of results for the same exercise carried out alternately in classical holding and inverted holding of the instruments in a cohort of novice learners. Materials and methodsTwenty-two medical students, novices in arthroscopic surgery, participated in the study. Each performed an exercise consisting of grasping ten targets with arthroscopic forceps and placing them in a basket on the VirtaMed ArthroS™ simulator. The exercise was performed with the scope and grasping instrument pointed away from the operator, “catch the stars front” (CTSF), then directed towards the operator, “catch the stars back” (CTSB). The simulator recorded several parameters making up an overall composite score (“overall performance score”, OPS) out of 120 points. Voluntary abandonment of the exercise was also collected. ResultsAll students completed the CTSF exercise but 6 dropped out of the CTSB exercise (27%, p=0.01). In the CTSF exercise, the average OPS was higher with 45.9 points versus 22.8 points in the CTSB exercise (p<0.001). By detailing the components of the OPS score, the parameters of interest on the Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Training (FAST) module of the simulator included: the distance traveled by the scope and the grasping forceps was significantly greater in the CTSB group (p<0.001), the duration of the exercise was significantly greater in the CTSB group (p<0.001), the time spent with the instruments in the videoscopic field was significantly lower in the CTSB group (p=0.001) and finally the absence of a significant difference in the camera alignment compared to the horizontal plane between the two groups. ConclusionThe exercise with the instruments directed towards the operator is more difficult with a greater distribution for all the secondary criteria except for the camera alignment, which suggests that it could be more discriminating. The dropout rate is also higher. It would therefore be interesting to introduce CTSB type training in initial training programs in arthroscopy. Level of evidenceIII, comparative prospective study.