Abstract
This article offers an overview of the main arguments of Artefacts of Legal Inquiry: The Value of Imagination in Adjudication (2020). It addresses three main areas, within the theory of legal reasoning, to which the book sought to contribute: (1) methodology and meta-theory; (2) the relationship between artefactual language and imagination; and (3) the value of artefactual language and imagination for adjudication.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
