Abstract
ABSTRACT Authenticating artworks can be difficult in the absence of reliable records. Record artwork prices at auction and sales through galleries incentivises criminal practices by exploiting vulnerabilities intrinsic within the process of provenance records. Consequently, falsifying provenance documents is a common method for legitimising and enabling the sale of stolen or forged art. In this context, and utilising Cohen and Felson’s crime triangle concept, an absence of capable guardianship arguably occurs when provenance research is inadequate, facilitating criminal activity. The ability to authenticate an artwork provides a key art crime prevention strategy to constrain illegitimate art from entering legitimate art collections. Using a case study research method, this paper investigates the contemporary conditions in which provenance research is performed. Future directions of provenance research practices are also discussed, including the increased use of databases and the emerging role of blockchain technology.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
