Abstract
The preparations of digested samples of certifiable color additives by dry ashing and wet digestion for arsenic analysis by hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) were compared. The dry ashing technique was based on the preparation used in ASTM D4606-86 for determination of As and Se in coal. The acid digestion method used nitric and sulfuric acids heated by microwaves in sealed vessels. The digested color additives were analyzed for As by using hydride generated from sodium borohydride mixed with the acidified solution on a flow injection system leading to an atomic absorption spectrometer. Dry ashing was preferable to wet digestion because wet digestion yielded poor recoveries of added As. Dry ashing followed by hydride generation AAS gave determination limits of 0.5 ppm As in the color additives. At a specification level of 3 ppm As, the precision of the method using dry ashing was +/- 0.4 ppm (95% confidence interval).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
