Arrhythmic risk stratification in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy using cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Abstract

Abstract Background Myocardial fibrosis (MF) is an essential component of the arrhythmic substrate for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Aims To determine whether total myocardial fibrosis (TF) and gray zone fibrosis (GZF), assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance, are better than LVEF in predicting ventricular arrhythmias in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Methods and results Patients with NICM in a derivation cohort (n=866) and a validation cohort (n=848) underwent quantification of TF and GZF. The primary composite endpoint was sudden cardiac death (SCD) or VAs (ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia). The primary endpoint was met by 52/866 (6.0%) patients in the derivation cohort (follow-up of 7.5 years [interquartile range, IQR] 5.2-9.3). In competing risk analyses, MF on visual assessment (MFVA) predicted the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 5.83, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 3.15-10.8). Quantified MF measures permitted categorization into 3 risk groups: a TF >0 ≤ 10 g was associated with an intermediate risk (HR: 4.03 [95% CI 1.99-8.16]) and a TF > 10g with the highest risk (HR: 9.17 [95% CI 4.64-18.1]) compared to no MFVA (lowest risk) (Figure). Similar trends were observed in the validation cohort. Categorization into 3 risk groups was achievable using TF or GZF in combination or in isolation. In contrast, LVEF<35% was a poor predictor of the primary endpoint (validation cohort HR:1.99, 95% CI 0.99-0.41). Conclusions MFVA is a strong predictor of SCD and VAs in NICM. TF and GZF mass added incremental value to MFVA. In contrast, LVEF was not useful in arrhythmic risk stratification.