Abstract

Most experiments which have sought to determine the effects of arousal, exercise and/or physical work on psychomotor performance have been tainted by methodological problems. This paper presents a strategy that was developed to overcome one methodological shortcoming inherent in many such studies: the confounding of movement and heart rate. The technique involves administering mental tests during both movement and non-movement intervals, at pre-selected exercise states. Results of a validation experiment, in which 11 subjects performed numerous psychomotor tasks with and without movement at four work intensities (rest, 30% VO2max, 60% VO2max, and post-exercise) on two testing days indicate that this method was sufficiently sensitive to identify previously undetected effects, e.g., movement slows index finger tapping rate and may impair an individual's ability to stabilize speed-accuracy tradeoff strategies in serial choice reaction time tasks. Inverted-U effects were also found, replicating some previous investigations. The novel strategy detailed herein, which isolates the relative effects of movement and elevated heart rate, appears appropriate for use in studies aimed at quantifying the effects of exercise-induced arousal (via cycle ergometry) on mental performance before, during, and after exercise. This work has implications for improving research methodologies and predicting which sorts of everyday speeded mental tasks will be affected when one is simultaneously engaged in physical work.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call